seems that is already well established. It's like a tacit agreement not to be countered. Anyone who raises his voice to be heard and has lost most of his audience, and if it raises the pitch of her vocabulary has already lost the battle.
words should go in the ear of listeners with all sweetness, without interfering with any other sounds that were distracting their minds. If you want to change wave is at your sole decision, probably some alerted by his other senses, especially that of sight, fueled by factors such as good presence he or she, her physical beauty, or perhaps "an attentive audience," suggesting an interest on what they hear. The latter would be the best, but how do you get heard?
If the case of a speech is difficult and can even get health rogarla outcry among the people present, how difficult will attract some virtual readers in such high regard have certain postulated as the right policy that has been I do not know how to consolidate or why, given its absurd claims, imposed even though we know that, as its existence would still not change our very personal opinions about what they are trying to avoid do nothing but support those with this attitude are safer and more secure and greater capacity to continue to commit abuses with impunity?
This humble post and has little chance of succeeding. To be able to get readers to at least make my point, and I started bad because I put into question so thank God for some, with which I identify is not only the doctrine of quererquedarbienismo, preferring to classify chaperone , or a whore if you talk to bitterness, which to fuck for money plain and simple has always been called a bitch.
I spoke in another post " Splitting hairs" about the absurdity of this attitude in regard to changing the names of things, trying to distance his reality, his nickname, coming at such distances than at any time and not really know what we are talking with the consequences that this could lead us.
But it seems that it is not politically correct to speak ill of politicians and the crooks, or rather of political scoundrels and their derivatives, because if the essence of that doctrine is not to disqualify anyone not know how I can talk about things obviously poorly made without disqualifying the person who wrote.
Another problem arises when we call certain ethnic groups the way we've always done and not just to offend. What can not be and is already almost psychedelic is the word Gypsy, which is why they themselves are known, it is politically incorrect put into the mouth of a gipsy, that's how we call them, taking into account that one of its meanings is "ignorant and rude peasant."
And as if to make him understand that just can not understand, who do not want to understand what really is CORRECT, taking to do all this gibberish to be talking so politically correct, so do not say that just may not understand the jerk, ie stupid snobs who are the same thing, because it would be politically incorrect.
Another problem arises when we call certain ethnic groups the way we've always done and not just to offend. What can not be and is already almost psychedelic is the word Gypsy, which is why they themselves are known, it is politically incorrect put into the mouth of a gipsy, that's how we call them, taking into account that one of its meanings is "ignorant and rude peasant."
And as if to make him understand that just can not understand, who do not want to understand what really is CORRECT, taking to do all this gibberish to be talking so politically correct, so do not say that just may not understand the jerk, ie stupid snobs who are the same thing, because it would be politically incorrect.
But in the one case as in the other the only thing that would disqualify myself by attempting the impossible, wanting to open the eyes of those who do not want to see that culture is precisely the opposite of what they saying, except in terms of valid exceptions for obvious nobody is going to need to explain, I leave this issue here that I fully learned to anyone with half a brain and the way for what would have begun to speak from the beginning, but could not, having to postpone it to make these clarifications, given that to talk about it, it was necessary to speak clearly, that is so politically incorrect, and did not want those who still have minimum capacity, but sympathize with the politically correct might settle down, putting his opinion on me, as I fear it has already occurred from the first paragraph, not coming due to lack of participation in my reading, the same conclusions I already got and we could afford to live life with greater understanding and knowledge of the facts.
Not much to be said or rather what we must accept for better living, so we should not complain about how uncomfortable the preamble that the end of the day for some could be enlightening and like all great things should be simple, here's my proposal:
THINGS ARE NOT MORE OR LESS VALUE FOR THE WAY THEY CALL OR bombast OF ROUND LIKE THEM, BUT IN THIS SENSE YES that supports that can be sweetened IF YOUR NAME WAS NOT VERY SUCCESSFUL, AND ADJECTIVES WHAT IF YOU COULD BE APPLIED pejorative, BUT NOT loop the loop. WHAT HAPPINESS IS REALLY IMPORTANT THAT WE ALL FEEL A PRESENCE TO RECOGNIZE OUR VARIOUS, obviating any obstacle to our INTEGRATION TO START OFF ZERO AND BE BIG DEAL AS POSITIVE BY ALL MEANS ALL AGREE AND UNDERSTAND "ALL THAT HURT ANYONE" AND THAT YOU CAN GIVE TO OTHERS WHO DO NOT HAVE TO BE THOSE WHO ARE OR WERE WRONG, OR ARE PRETEND WHY THOSE WANTING TO BE AND HAVE ALWAYS HAD A REASON.
TAKING VERY, VERY BE AWARE THAT THE MINORITY, sharecropping, MOST, RICH, POOR, WHITE, BLACK, YELLOW, ATHEIST, HOLY, Capitalism, Communism, READY, clumsy, or alien, ETC., ETC. PRIVILEGE NOT GRANTED ON ANY OTHERS AS REQUIRED TO BE A SPECIAL POLITICAL TRANSPARENCY OF NOT EXIST, WE PUT IN THE STOCKS, HAVING TO GIVE EXPLANATION SOUND, WHICH WILL NO END TO HIS POSITION WITH THE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LIABILITY which they may be.
is incredible that after the terrible COMPLAINTS ACROSS THE ONLY GETS YOU IN RESPONSE THE SILENCE.
IMPUNITY FOR CHARGES WITH PERJURY THAT IS UNACCEPTABLE AND PUNISHABLE UPON SILENCE.
impunity of a crime REPORTED TO REASON is unacceptable and punishable FOR YOU AND FOR THOSE WHO RUN tolerated.
raising our BOOM THAT intimidated by our own insignificance we are still cried as politically incorrect.
AND EXECUTIVE AND JUDICIAL POWERS BY THE ORDER THAT THEY MAY APPLY, DO NOTHING.
THIS SILENCE OF THE "POLITICALLY CORRECT" AND ESPECIALLY THE SILENCE OF LIABILITY THAT HAVE TO INTERVENE AND STREET, SILENCE OF THE EFFORT THAT EVEN dare we say SOMETHING.
Not much to be said or rather what we must accept for better living, so we should not complain about how uncomfortable the preamble that the end of the day for some could be enlightening and like all great things should be simple, here's my proposal:
THINGS ARE NOT MORE OR LESS VALUE FOR THE WAY THEY CALL OR bombast OF ROUND LIKE THEM, BUT IN THIS SENSE YES that supports that can be sweetened IF YOUR NAME WAS NOT VERY SUCCESSFUL, AND ADJECTIVES WHAT IF YOU COULD BE APPLIED pejorative, BUT NOT loop the loop. WHAT HAPPINESS IS REALLY IMPORTANT THAT WE ALL FEEL A PRESENCE TO RECOGNIZE OUR VARIOUS, obviating any obstacle to our INTEGRATION TO START OFF ZERO AND BE BIG DEAL AS POSITIVE BY ALL MEANS ALL AGREE AND UNDERSTAND "ALL THAT HURT ANYONE" AND THAT YOU CAN GIVE TO OTHERS WHO DO NOT HAVE TO BE THOSE WHO ARE OR WERE WRONG, OR ARE PRETEND WHY THOSE WANTING TO BE AND HAVE ALWAYS HAD A REASON.
TAKING VERY, VERY BE AWARE THAT THE MINORITY, sharecropping, MOST, RICH, POOR, WHITE, BLACK, YELLOW, ATHEIST, HOLY, Capitalism, Communism, READY, clumsy, or alien, ETC., ETC. PRIVILEGE NOT GRANTED ON ANY OTHERS AS REQUIRED TO BE A SPECIAL POLITICAL TRANSPARENCY OF NOT EXIST, WE PUT IN THE STOCKS, HAVING TO GIVE EXPLANATION SOUND, WHICH WILL NO END TO HIS POSITION WITH THE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LIABILITY which they may be.
is incredible that after the terrible COMPLAINTS ACROSS THE ONLY GETS YOU IN RESPONSE THE SILENCE.
IMPUNITY FOR CHARGES WITH PERJURY THAT IS UNACCEPTABLE AND PUNISHABLE UPON SILENCE.
impunity of a crime REPORTED TO REASON is unacceptable and punishable FOR YOU AND FOR THOSE WHO RUN tolerated.
raising our BOOM THAT intimidated by our own insignificance we are still cried as politically incorrect.
AND EXECUTIVE AND JUDICIAL POWERS BY THE ORDER THAT THEY MAY APPLY, DO NOTHING.
THIS SILENCE OF THE "POLITICALLY CORRECT" AND ESPECIALLY THE SILENCE OF LIABILITY THAT HAVE TO INTERVENE AND STREET, SILENCE OF THE EFFORT THAT EVEN dare we say SOMETHING.
CAN NOT BELIEVE THAT THE FIRST TIME SO BE DRAWN criticize others, rather, it should be ashamed of himself to Missing and daring GUTS TO DEFEND HIS INTEGRITY EXPRESSLY, PHYSICAL, MORAL AND FINANCIAL SUPPORT OR LESS WHAT TO DO IF Instead of criticizing?
AS TO THE SECOND, DO NOT BELIEVE THAT ITS INHIBITION IN ADDITION TO BE A SHAME FOR THEM AND THEIR FAMILIES, IT IS A CRIME THAT INVOLVES and those involved in punishable acts that covers YOUR SILENCE?.
TRULY SAY TO EACH OTHER AND WHEN YOU COMPLAIN THAT ARE SILENCED PANS OF POLITICALLY INCORRECT AND THAT IF A POLITICALLY CORRECT TO ASSUME THE RAMPAGE IRRITATION INVOLVED AT ALL LEVELS TO BREED NOTING THAT CLAIMS TO CHILLING SILENCE IS THE ANSWER AND THEY ACTED THAT SHOULD INTERVENE AND OMISSIONS not be punished, IS REALLY TALKING TO PROPERTY WHEN AND WHY WE CAN SAY THAT WHAT IS HAPPENING IS NOT "politically correct."
AS TO THE SECOND, DO NOT BELIEVE THAT ITS INHIBITION IN ADDITION TO BE A SHAME FOR THEM AND THEIR FAMILIES, IT IS A CRIME THAT INVOLVES and those involved in punishable acts that covers YOUR SILENCE?.
TRULY SAY TO EACH OTHER AND WHEN YOU COMPLAIN THAT ARE SILENCED PANS OF POLITICALLY INCORRECT AND THAT IF A POLITICALLY CORRECT TO ASSUME THE RAMPAGE IRRITATION INVOLVED AT ALL LEVELS TO BREED NOTING THAT CLAIMS TO CHILLING SILENCE IS THE ANSWER AND THEY ACTED THAT SHOULD INTERVENE AND OMISSIONS not be punished, IS REALLY TALKING TO PROPERTY WHEN AND WHY WE CAN SAY THAT WHAT IS HAPPENING IS NOT "politically correct."
0 comments:
Post a Comment